![]() That said, very few series have a perfect ending, and this conclusion is admirable in every regard. This is the supposed end to a fantastic series, and needed to have a bit more cinematic gravitas to hit you right in the gut. I laughed, sadly, when I should have been feeling meloncholy. I wont go into detail, but it isn't Benjamin Button effects. It's the money shot moment, the grand resolution, but it honestly looks silly. The exact resolution of the book does not transfer well to film. There's a bit of a cheese factor to the denouement. I really believe we will see great performances from him in the future. His ability to bear the tragic nature of his circ*mstance, and be an ass-kicking action hero is not to be underestimated. Daniel Radcliff is the anchor for all the Potter films. These actors have grown into their adult character roles and deliver them well here. They are adults, fighting for their lives and a cause. Harry, Ron, and Hermione are not children here. Christopher Columbus (original director and producer) hit a home run when he cast the primary characters. The character work continues to be great. I've noticed the last three Potter films were more prone to this kind of lazy storytelling, but maybe I'm being too picky. My thought is that they're assuming everyone has read the book, and decided not to spend any time in the final cut quibbling with details. ![]() So, if you hadn't read the book, and didn't know its consequences, then it would be confusing. Harry's possession of The Deathly Hallows is key to the finale, but this is never fully understood in the movie. The filmmakers make no effort to explain pivotal plot points. ![]() There's balls to the walls action, then scenes of total quiet that don't connect. It could be that I've read the book, and while not expecting an exact adaptation, Rowling's battle isn't nearly as mythic as the one we see here. This is expected as the final battle between Harry and Voldemort, but it takes on a Transformers-esque gratuity that caught me by suprise. I can honestly say there were cheers in the theater during these pivotal scenes, so they did elicit an audience response.īigger is better is the Hollywood way and the filmmakers went all out to have a huge action climax. Several characters are killed while others find love in their darkest moments. The climax is an all out war between those loyal to Harry against Voldemort's death eaters. The school had been the primary location for the previous stories, and is totally absent in the first part of the sequel. The film builds up to an epic battle at Hogwarts. Their goal is to destroy them, thus leaving the dark lord mortal and able to be killed. Part 2 picks up with Harry (Daniel Radcliffe), Ron (Rupert Grint), and Hermione (Emma Watson) continuing their quest for Horcruxes - objects that hold pieces of Lord Voldemort's (Ralph Fiennes) soul. It's almost like trying to force tears and blow up firecrackers at the same time. This last film comes off as a popcorn action film. Director David Yates has done an excellent job directing the last four movies of the epic franchise. Film adaptations are a different animal, but considering the last book was split into two films, I had hoped for a more emotionally complete ending akin to the book. The conclusion to this magnus opus was brilliantly conceived in the nine hundred page novel, where subtlety and substance could slowly boil to a triumphant ending. Rowling's boy wizard gets a spectacular, yet not entirely satisfying finale in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 2. Rowling's boy wizard gets a spectacular, yet not entirely satisfying finale.
0 Comments
Reserves the right to "hide" comments that may be considered offensive, illegal or inappropriate and to "ban" users that violate the site's Terms Of Service. ![]() You can also send an e-mail to with pertinent details. To do so, click the downward arrow on the top-right corner of the Facebook comment (the arrow is invisible until you roll over it) and select the appropriate action. To report spam or any abusive, obscene, defamatory, racist, homophobic or threatening comments, or anything that may violate any applicable laws, use the "Report to Facebook" and "Mark as spam" links that appear next to the comments themselves. User comments or postings do not reflect the viewpoint ofĭoes not endorse, or guarantee the accuracy of, any user comment. ![]() Once you're logged in, you will be able to comment. Story or review, you must be logged in to an active personal account on Facebook. Whether Johnston will be able to produce evidence that these similarities rise to the level of "substantial" or "striking" in view of NICKELBACK's level of access is yet to be determined, she said. Having listened to both songs, Hightower found that it is possible for a reasonable juror to determine that the works share protectable elements. NICKELBACK had asserted that Johnston cannot state a claim for copyright infringement because "fundamentally, the works at issue are not substantially similar to an ordinary observer." They argued that the works are so dissimilar as to defeat Johnston's claim for copyright infringement as a matter of law. " Johnston has alleged facts sufficient to raise his right to relief above the speculative level, which is all that is required at the pleading stage," Hightower said. District Court for the Western District of Texas that Johnston's complaint sufficiently alleged NICKELBACK's members had access to his song "Rock Star". On Wednesday (August 11), Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower said in her report and recommendation to Judge Robert Pitman of the U.S. Johnston seeks damages for copyright infringement and an injunction against further infringement. Johnston alleges that "a substantial amount of the music in 'Rockstar' is copied from original composition 'Rock Star'," including "the tempo, song form, melodic structure, harmonic structures, and lyrical themes." In January 2005, NICKELBACK released the song "Rockstar" on its album "All The Right Reasons". ![]() Johnston alleges that NICKELBACK had direct access to Johnston's musical composition "Rock Star" as a result of SNOWBLIND REVIVAL's marketing efforts. The band made 15 copies of the master recording and sent them to several record labels, including Universal Music Group and Warner Music Group, of which Roadrunner Records, Inc. In August 2001, SNOWBLIND REVIVAL created a master recording of "Rock Star", along with three other original songs. alleging that the NICKELBACK copied his original musical composition, "Rock Star", which he wrote in 2001 while a member of the band SNOWBLIND REVIVAL. Kirk Johnston filed a lawsuit against NICKELBACK members Chad Kroeger, Michael Kroeger, Ryan Peake and Daniel Adair, as well as the band's former record label Roadrunner Records and Warner Chappell Music, Inc. Even the chorus … I thought that was my best revenge after a really s***** argument.” The song in question was “ How You Remind Me.A Texas federal magistrate judge has told a federal district court that NICKELBACK must face a copyright lawsuit claiming the rock band ripped off its 2005 hit song "Rockstar" from an earlier track called "Rock Star". ![]() I had written the second verse, the whole ‘Cause living with me must have damn near killed you,’ when it got to that part, I really wanted her to hear it. “I wanted it to be really loud so she could hear everything I was saying. “I would sing into a PA - there was an actual microphone in front of me - I wasn’t just singing into the room, so it felt like I was really delivering the song,” Kroeger added. I went downstairs and I turned on my PA system. We got into a fight about something stupid, like what most people fight about. “We had been living together for a while, something like two-and-a-half years. “I was living with a girl at the time,” he recalled. Nickelback | Paul Bergen/Redferns Chad Kroeger performed this Nickelback song very loudly in his basementĭuring an interview with Billboard, Kroeger discussed the origin of a Nickelback song. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |